A queue or cue is a hairstyle worn by the Jurchen and Manchu peoples of Manchuria, and was later required to be worn by male subjects of Qing China. Hair on top of the scalp is grown long and is often braided, while the front portion of the head is shaved. The edict that Han Chinese men and others under Manchu rule give up their traditional hairstyles and wear the queue, the Tifayifu, was met with resistance, although opinions about the queue did change over time. Han women were never required to wear their hair in the traditional women’s Manchu style, liangbatou, although that too was a symbol of Manchu identity. The queue hairstyle predates the Manchus. The Chinese word for queue, bian, meant plaited hair or a cord. The term bian, when used to describe the braid in the Manchu hairstyle, was originally applied by the Han dynasty to the Xiongnu. The distinctive hairstyle led to its wearers being targeted during anti-Chinese riots in Australia and the United States. Jurchen people wore a queue like the Manchu, the Khitan people wore theirs in Tartar style and during the Tang dynasty, tribes in the west wore braids. The Xianbei and Wuhuan were said to shave their heads, while Xiongnu had queues. Other evidence from Chinese histories indicate that the Tuoba or Tabgach groups of the Xianbei wore braids, since they were called “braided” by the southern Chinese. However, their hairstyle is hidden in depictions due to a hood they wore. A braid of hair was found at Zhalairuoer in a Tuoba grave. Han Chinese also made the peoples they conquered undo their queues. To show submission to the Han Chinese of the Sui dynasty, the people of Turfan (Gaochang) undid their queues, as did the Göktürks upon surrendering to the Tang dynasty. Hairstyles showed affiliation to a tribal confederation or dynasty. The Liu Song dynasty’s records called them “braided caitiff”, suolu, while Southern Qi’s history said they wore their “hair hanging down the back” (pifa), and called them suotou, “braided”. After overthrowing the Mongol Yuan dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang, the first Ming emperor passed a law on mandatory hairstyle on 24 September 1392 mandating that all males grow their hair long and making it illegal for them to shave part of their foreheads while leaving strands of hair, which was the Mongol hairstyle. The penalty for both the barber and the person who was shaved and his sons was castration if they cut their hair and their families were to be sent to the borders for exile. This helped eradicate the partially shaved Mongol hairstyles. In the Western Wei cave 285 at the Mogao Caves in Dunhuang, Xianbei people are depicted with small queues hanging from their necks. It resembled a monk’s hairstyle but was not exactly like their tonsure, it left the face to be framed on the sides and forehead by a fringe of hair by shaving the head top and leaving it bald. This made sure the Tibetans and Song Chinese could be told apart from shaved Tanguts. The Tangut people of the Western Xia may have inherited hairstyle influences from the Tuoba. It was imposed by the Tangut emperor, Jingzong, threatening that their throats would be cut if they did not shave within three days. The emperor was the first one to shave. Unlike the tonsure of the Tangut Western Xia, the Jurchen hairstyle of wearing the queue combined with shaving the crown was not the invention of an emperor of the dynasty but was an established Jurchen hairstyle which showed who submitted to Jin rule. This Jurchen queue and shaving hairstyle was not enforced on the Han Chinese in the Jin after an initial attempt to do so which was a rebuke to Jurchen values. The Jin at first attempted to impose Jurchen hairstyle and clothes on the Han population during the Jin but the order was taken back. Manchu Jurchen men had queues, while Mongol men swept their hair behind their ears and plaited them, Turk men wore loose hair and Xiongnu men braided their hair. They also banned intermarriage. The Han Chinese men living in the Liao dynasty were not required to wear the shaved Khitan hairstyle which Khitan men wore to distinguish their ethnicity, unlike the Qing dynasty which mandated wearing of the Manchu hairstyle for men. Khitan males grew hair from their temples but shaved the crown of their heads. Khitan men left only two separate patches of hair on each of the forehead’s sides in front of each ear in tresses while they shaved the top of their head. Khitan wore felt hats, fur clothes and woolen cloth and the Liao emperor switched between Han and Khitan clothing. Khitan wore the long side fringes and shaved pates. Khitan officials used gold ornamented ribbons to found their hair locks around their foreheads, covering their heads with felt hats according to the Ye Longli’s (Yeh Lung-li) Qidan Guozhi (Ch’i-tan kuo-chih). Only at the temples were hair left while the crown was shaven. Tomb murals of Khitan hairstyle show only some hair remaining near the neck and forehead with the rest of the head shaved. The absence of Khitan clothes and hairstyles on a painting of riders previously identified as Khitan has led to experts questioning their purported identity. Khitan men might have differentiate between classes by wearing different patterns on their small braids hanging off their shaved foreheads. They wore the braids occasionally with a forehead fringe with some shaving off all the forehead. Some Han men adopted and mixed or combined Han clothing with Khitan clothing with Khitan boots and Han clothes or wearing Khitan clothes. Han women on the other hand did not adopt Khitan dress and continued wearing Han dress. Jurchen men, like their Manchu descendants, wore their hair in queues. Some Han rebels impersonated Jurchen by wearing their hair in the Jurchen “pigtail” to strike fear within the Jurchen population. In 1126, the Jurchen ordered male Han within their conquered territories to adopt the Jurchen hairstyle by shaving the front of their heads and to adopt Jurchen dress, but the order was lifted. The queue was a specifically male hairstyle worn by the Manchu from central Manchuria and later imposed on the Han Chinese during the Qing dynasty. The hair on the front of the head was shaved off above the temples every ten days and the remainder of the hair was braided into a long braid. The Manchu hairstyle was forcefully introduced to Han Chinese and other ethnicities like the Nanai in the early 17th century during the transition from Ming to Qing. The Ming general of Fushun, Li Yongfang, defected to Nurhaci after Nurhaci promised him rewards, titles, and Nurhaci’s own granddaughter in marriage. Nurhaci of the Aisin Gioro clan declared the establishment of the Later Jin dynasty, later becoming the Qing dynasty of China, after Ming dynasty forces in Liaodong defected to his side. Other Han Chinese generals in Liaodong proceeded to defect with their armies to Nurhaci and were given women from the Aisin Gioro family in marriage. Once firmly in power, Nurhaci commanded all men in the areas he conquered to adopt the Manchu hairstyle. The hairstyle was compulsory for all males and the penalty for non-compliance was execution for treason. The Manchu hairstyle signified all ethnic groups submission to Qing rule, and also aided the Manchu identification of those Han who refused to accept Qing dynasty domination. After the fall of the Qing dynasty in 1912, the Chinese no longer had to wear the Manchu queue. The Amur peoples already wore the queue on the back of their heads but did not shave the front until the Qing subjected them and ordered them to shave. The term “shaved-head people” was used to describe the Nanai people by Ulch people. Qing dynasty during the seventeenth century. Ryukyuan people of the Ryukyu Kingdom, a tributary of China, requested and were granted an exemption from the mandate. The Nanais at first fought against the Nurhaci and the Manchus, led by their own Nanai Hurka chief Sosoku before surrendering to Hongtaiji in 1631. Mandatory shaving of the front of all male heads was imposed on Amur peoples like the Nanai people who were conquered by the Qing. Traditionally, adult Han Chinese did not cut their hair for philosophical and cultural reasons. This idea is the quintessence of filial duty. We are given our body, skin and hair from our parents; which we ought not to damage. As a result of this ideology, both men and women wound their hair into a bun (a topknot) or other various hairstyles. 身體髮膚，受之父母，不敢毀傷，孝之始也。 Han Chinese did not object to wearing the queue braid on the back of the head as they traditionally wore all their hair long, but fiercely objected to shaving the forehead so the Qing government exclusively focused on forcing people to shave the forehead rather than wear the braid. Han rebels in the first half of the Qing who objected to Qing hairstyle wore the braid but defied orders to shave the front of the head. One person was executed for refusing to shave the front but he had willingly braided the back of his hair. It was only later that westernized revolutionaries began to view the braid as backwards and advocated adopting short-haired western styles. Han rebels against the Qing like the Taiping retained their queue braids on the back but rebelled by growing hair on the front of their heads. Koxinga criticized the Qing hairstyle by referring to the shaven pate looking like a fly. This caused the Qing government to view shaving the front of the head as the primary sign of loyalty rather than wearing the braid on the back, which did not violate Han customs and traditional Han did not object to. Koxinga and his men objected to shaving when the Qing demanded they shave in exchange for recognizing Koxinga as a feudatory. The Qing demanded that Zheng Jing and his men on Taiwan shave to receive recognition as a fiefdom. His men and Ming prince Zhu Shugui fiercely objected to shaving. In 1644, Beijing was sacked by a coalition of rebel forces led by Li Zicheng, a minor Ming dynasty official turned leader of a peasant revolt. The Chongzhen Emperor committed suicide when the city fell, marking the official end of the Ming dynasty. The Han Chinese Ming general Wu Sangui and his army then defected to the Qing and allowed them through Shanhai pass. They then forced Han Chinese to adopt the queue as a sign of submission. They then seized control of Beijing, overthrowing Li’s short-lived Shun dynasty. A year later, after the Qing armies reached South China, on 21 July 1645, the regent Dorgon issued an edict ordering all Han men to shave their foreheads and braid the rest of their hair into a queue identical to those worn by the Manchus. Qing Manchu prince Dorgon initially canceled the order for all men in Ming territories south of the Great wall (post 1644 additions to the Qing) to shave. The Han Chinese were given 10 days to comply or face death. It was a Han official from Shandong, Sun Zhixie and Li Ruolin who voluntarily shaved their foreheads and demanded Qing Prince Dorgon impose the queue hairstyle on the entire population which led to the queue order. In the edict, Dorgon specifically emphasized the fact that Manchus and the Qing Emperor himself all wore the queue and shaved their foreheads, so that by following the queue order, Han Chinese would look like the Manchus and the Emperor. Though Dorgon admitted that followers of Confucianism might have grounds for objection, most Han officials cited the Ming dynasty’s traditional System of Rites and Music as their reason for resistance. This invoked the Confucian notion that the people were like the sons of the emperor, and should be similar in their appearance. The slogan adopted by the Qing was “Cut the hair and keep the head, (or) keep the hair and cut the head” (Chinese: 留髮不留頭，留頭不留髮; pinyin: liú fà bù liú tóu, liú tóu bù liú fà). People who resisted the order were met with deadly force. Han rebels in Shandong tortured the Qing official who suggested the queue order to Dorgon to death and killed his relatives. The imposition of this order was not uniform; it took up to 10 years of martial enforcement for all of China to be brought into compliance, and while it was the Qing who imposed the queue hairstyle on the general population, they did not always personally execute those who did not obey. It was Han Chinese defectors who carried out massacres against people refusing to wear the queue. The third massacre left few survivors. The three massacres at Jiading District are some of the most infamous, with estimated death tolls in the tens or even hundreds of thousands. Jiangyin also held out against about 10,000 Qing troops for 83 days. When the city wall was finally breached on 9 October 1645, the Qing army, led by the Han Chinese Ming defector Liu Liangzuo (劉良佐), who had been ordered to “fill the city with corpses before you sheathe your swords,” massacred the entire population, killing between 74,000 and 100,000 people. Han Chinese soldiers in 1645 under Han General Hong Chengchou forced the queue on the people of Jiangnan, while Han people were initially paid silver to wear the queue in Fuzhou when it was first implemented. Jiading within a month, resulting in tens of thousands of deaths. The Qing required people serving as officials to wear Manchu clothing, but allowed other Han civilians to continue wearing Hanfu (Han clothing). The queue was the only aspect of Manchu culture that the Qing forced on the common Han population. Throughout the Qing dynasty Han women continued to wear Han clothing. Changshan of their own free will. However, the shaving policy was not enforced in the Tusi autonomous chiefdoms in Southwestern China where many minorities lived. There was one Han Chinese Tusi, the Chiefdom of Kokang populated by Han Kokang people. During the Qing Salar men shaved their hair bald while when they went to journey in public they put on artificial queues. Uyghur males at the present still shave their heads bald in the summer. Uyghur men shaved their hair bald during the Qing. However, after Jahangir Khoja invaded Kashgar, Turkistani Muslim begs and officials in Xinjiang eagerly fought for the “privilege” of wearing a queue to show their steadfast loyalty to the Empire. Chen Cheng observed that Muslim Turks in 14th-15th century Turfan and Kumul shaved their heads while non-Muslim Turks grew long hair. High-ranking begs were granted this right. The purpose of the Queue Order was to demonstrate loyalty to the Qing, and refusing to shave one’s hair came to symbolize revolutionary ideals, as seen during the White Lotus Rebellion. Because of this, the members of the Taiping Rebellion were sometimes called the Long hairs (長毛) or Hair rebels (髮逆). Han Chinese resistance to adopting the queue was widespread and bloody. The Chinese in the Liaodong Peninsula rebelled in 1622 and 1625 in response to the implementation of the mandatory hairstyle. The Manchus responded swiftly by killing the educated elite and instituting a stricter separation between Han Chinese and Manchus. In 1645, the enforcement of the queue order was taken a step further by the ruling Manchus when it was decreed that any man who did not adopt the Manchu hairstyle within ten days would be executed. The intellectual Lu Xun summed up the Chinese reaction to the implementation of the mandatory Manchu hairstyle by stating, “In fact, the Chinese people in those days revolted not because the country was on the verge of ruin, but because they had to wear queues.” In 1683 Zheng Keshuang surrendered and wore a queue. Some revolutionists, supporters of the Hundred Days’ Reform or students who studied abroad cut their braids. The queue became a symbol of the Qing dynasty and a custom except among Buddhist monastics. The Xinhai Revolution in 1911 led to a complete change in hairstyle almost overnight. Many people were violating the Qing laws on hair at the end of the dynasty. Some Chinese chose to wear the queue but not to shave their crown, while those people who cut the queue off and did not shave were considered revolutionary and others maintained the state-mandated combination of the queue and shaved crown. Neither Taoist priests nor Buddhist monks were required to wear the queue by the Qing; they continued to wear their traditional hairstyles, completely shaved heads for Buddhist monks, and long hair in the traditional Chinese topknot for Taoist priests. The Manchus’ willingness to impose the queue and their dress style on the men of China was viewed as an example to emulate by some foreign observers. Cantonese outlaw bandit pirates in the Guangdong maritime frontier with Vietnam in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries wore their hair long in defiance of the Qing laws which mandated cutting. In his view, the British administration should have outlawed practises such as Sati much earlier than 1829, which James ascribed to a British unwillingness to challenge long-held Indian traditions, no matter how detrimental they were to the country. H. E. M. James, a British civil servant in India, wrote in 1887 that the British ought to act in a similarly decisive way when imposing their will in India. The Yangtze valley was controlled by Qing officials such as Liu Kunyi and Zhang Zhidong, who were not under Beijing’s influence and whom Boulger believed Britain could work with to stabilize China. He proposed that at Nanjing and Hankou a force of Chinese soldiers trained by the British be deployed and in Hong Kong, Weihaiwei and the Yangtze valley and it would have no allegiance to the Qing, and as such they in his idea would forgo the queue and be made to grow their hair long as a symbolic measure to “increasing the confidence of the Chinese in the advent of a new era”. English adventurer Augustus Frederick Lindley wrote that the beardless, youthful long haired Han Chinese rebels from Hunan in the Taiping armies who grew all their hair long while fighting against the Qing dynasty were among the most beautiful men in the world unlike, in his mind, the Han Chinese who wore the queue, with Lindley calling the shaved part “a disfigurement”. After Nguyễn Huệ defeated the Later Lê dynasty, high ranking Lê loyalists and the last Lê emperor Lê Chiêu Thống fled Vietnam for asylum in Qing China. British author Demetrius Charles Boulger in 1899 proposed that Britain form and head an alliance of “Philo-Chinese Powers” in setting up a new government for China based in Shanghai and Nanking as two capitals along the River Yangtze, to counter the interests of other powers in the region like the Russians due to what he believed was the imminent collapse of the Qing dynasty. They adopted Qing clothing and adopt the queue hairstyle, effectively becoming naturalized subjects of the Qing dynasty affording them protection against Vietnamese demands for extradition. Some Lê loyalists were also sent to Central Asia in Urumqi. They went to Beijing where Lê Chiêu Thống was appointed a Chinese mandarin of the fourth rank in the Han Yellow Bordered Banner, while lower ranking loyalists were sent to cultivate government land and join the Green Standard Army in Sichuan and Zhejiang. Modern descendants of the Lê monarch can be traced to southern Vietnam and Urumqi, Xinjiang. The queue is also a Native American hairstyle, as described in the book House Made of Dawn by N. Scott Momaday. In the 18th century, European soldiers styled their traditionally long hair into a queue called the “soldier’s queue.” The 18th century custom of tying long curly wigs (which normally reached down the back and chest) behind the neck began among soldiers and hunters, as seen as early as 1678 in a depiction of King Louis XIV hunting with his hair tied back. A 1697 depiction of a royal guard during the wedding of the Duke of Burgundy shows the sporting of this hairstyle, which came to influence civilian fashions due to the frequent wars France engaged in during Louis’ reign. The queue, either curled or covered with a silk bag (known as a bag wig), gradually replaced the unwieldy big wigs and remained important to men’s fashion until the change of dress in the 1790s effected by the French Revolution. For civilian men, the tyewig (a wig tied into a queue) and the bag wig became widespread after the death of Louis XIV; wigs that did not feature a queue such as the bob wig were favoured by those who could not afford a long wig. By the 1730s, the queue had spread from the military and became widespread among civilians. The type of wig became an indicator of one’s rank, occupation and political leanings. The first western army in which the wearing of a queue by its soldiers was forbidden was the Russian army in the 1780s. Grigory Potemkin, a Russian statesman and favourite of Catherine the Great, abhorred the tight uniforms and uncomfortable powdered wigs tied in a queue worn by soldiers of the Russian Army and instigated a complete revision of both. The French army plaited their wigs into a short queue (the French word for “tail”) tied with a ribbon in the back, while the British military used the Ramillies wig, which featured a very long queue tied with two black ribbons, one at the neck and one at the tail end. Along with comfortable, practical, well-fitting uniforms, his reforms introduced neat, natural hairstyles for all, with no wigs, powder and grease, or hair-tying evident. The French army continued keeping queues until the French Consulate period (1799-1804), when Napoleon Bonaparte and other officers promoted close cropped hair, known as à la Titus. Marshal Jean Lannes notably stood out due to his refusal to cut his queue. While not always braided, the hair was pulled back very tight into a single tail, wrapped around a piece of leather and tied down with a ribbon. British soldiers and sailors during the 18th century also wore their hair in a queue. The hair was often greased and powdered in a fashion similar to powdered wigs, or tarred in the case of sailors. The use of white hair powder in the British Army was discontinued in 1796 and queues were ordered to be cut off four years later. It was said that the soldiers’ hair was pulled back so tightly that they had difficulty closing their eyes afterwards. They continued to be worn in the Royal Navy for a while longer, where they were known as “pigtails”. In the Prussian Army and those of several other states within the Holy Roman Empire, can you wear a hanfu for chinese new year the soldier’s queue was mandatory under the reign of Frederick William I of Prussia. An artificial or “patent” queue was issued to recruits whose hair was too short to plait. The order was highly unpopular with both officers and men, leading to several desertions and threats of resignation. In the United States Army, the order to remove all queues was issued on 30 April 1801 by Major General James Wilkinson. Evans, Thammy (2006). Great Wall of China: Beijing & Northern China. Bradt Travel Guide Great Wall of China. Bradt Travel Guides. p. One senior officer, Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Butler, was eventually court-martialled in 1803 for failing to cut his hair. University of Hawai’i Art Gallery. University of Hawaii at Manoa Art Gallery; Chazen Museum of Art; Museum of International Folk Art (N.M.); Evergrand Art Museum (Taoyuan, Taiwan) (2009). Writing with Thread: Traditional Textiles of South Minorities : a Special Exhibition from the Collection of Huang Ying Feng and the Evergrand Art Museum in Taoyuan, Taiwan. Ebrey, Patricia Buckley; Walthall, Anne; Palais, James B. (2006). Pre-modern East Asia: To 1800: A Cultural, Social, and Political History. Millward, James (1998). Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759-1864 (illustrated ed.). Stanford University Press. p. 2013). Sport Across Asia: Politics, Cultures, and Identities. Bromber, Katrin; Krawietz, Birgit; Maguire, Joseph, eds. Vol. 21 (illustrated ed.). The World of Chinese. Pyun, Kyunghee; Wong, Aida Yuen (2018). Fashion, Identity, and Power in Modern Asia. East Asian History. 1994. p. Rubo, Han; Liu, Hatty (23 July 2019). “Hairy History”. Kuwayama, George (1991). Ancient Mortuary Traditions of China: Papers on Chinese Ceramic Funerary Sculptures. Godley, Michael R. (December 1994). “The End of the Queue: Hair as a Symbol in Chinese History” (PDF). Abramson, Marc Samuel (2005). “4 Deep Eyes and High Noses : Physiognomy and the depiction of barbarians in Tang China”. In Di Cosmo, Nicola; Wyatt, Don J (eds.). Far Eastern Art Council, Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries and Human Geographies in Chinese History (illustrated ed.). Duan, Wenjie; Kapila Vatsyayan (1994). Tan, Chung (ed.). Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts. Dunhuang Art: Through the Eyes of Duan Wenjie. Keay, John (2011). China: A History. Keay, John (2011). China: A History. Chan, Hok-Lam (2009). “Ming Taizu’s ‘Placards’ on Harsh Regulations and Punishments Revealed in Gu Qiyuan’s ‘Kezuo Zhuiyu.'”. Tackett, Nicolas (2017). The Origins of the Chinese Nation: Song China and the Forging of an East Asian World Order. Franke, Herbert; Twitchett, Denis C. (1994). The Cambridge History of China: Volume 6, Alien Regimes and Border States, 907-1368. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press. p. The Cambridge China Library. Zhu, Ruixi; Zhang, Bangwei; Liu, Fusheng; Cai, Chongbang; Wang, Zengyu (2016). A Social History of Medieval China. Cambridge University Press. p. Bang Qian Zhu (translator), Peter Ditmanson (contributor) (illustrated ed.). Liu, Cary Yee-Wei; Ching, Dora C. Y., eds. 1999). Arts of the Sung and Yüan: Ritual, Ethnicity, and Style in Painting. Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), Princeton University. Art Museum, Kuo li ku kung po wu yüan, Guo li gu gong bo wu yuan. Art Museum, Princeton University. 2006). Gilded Splendor: Treasures of China’s Liao Empire. Shen, Hsueh-man; Asia Society, eds. Harry N. Abrams. p. Asia Society Museum, Museum für Ostasiatische Kunst (Berlin, Germany), Museum Rietberg (illustrated ed.). Zhou, Xun; Gao, Chunming; Shang-hai shih hsi chʿü hsüeh hsiao.; Chung-kuo fu chuang shih yen chiu tsu (1987). 5000 years of Chinese costumes (reprint ed.). Museum of Fine Arts. Tung, W. U.; Tung, Wu; Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (1997). Tales from the Land of Dragons: 1000 Years of Chinese Painting (illustrated ed.). Johnson, Linda Cooke (2011). Women of the Conquest Dynasties: Gender and Identity in Liao and Jin China. UPCC book collections on Project MUSE (illustrated ed.). University of Hawaiʻi Press. Johnson, Linda Cooke (2011). Women of the Conquest Dynasties: Gender and Identity in Liao and Jin China. University of Hawaiʻi Press. 张博泉 (Zhang Boquan) (1984), pp. Forsyth, James (1994). A History of the Peoples of Siberia: Russia’s North Asian Colony 1581-1990 (illustrated, reprint, revised ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. UPCC book collections on Project MUSE (illustrated ed.). Majewicz, Alfred F., ed. 2011). Materials for the Study of Tungusic Languages and Folklore (illustrated, reprint ed.).

Walter de Gruyter. p. Paolo Santangelo (2013). Zibuyu, “What The Master Would Not Discuss”, according to Yuan Mei (1716-1798): A Collection of Supernatural Stories (2 vols). Evelyn S. Rawski (1998). The Last Emperors: A Social History of Qing Imperial Institutions. 薙发易服”政策”. De Bary; William T. (1999). Sources of Chinese Tradition. University of California Press. Columbia University Press. p. Godley, Michael R. (September 2011). “The End of the Queue: Hair as Symbol in Chinese History”. Meyer-Fong, Tobie (2013). What Remains: Coming to Terms with Civil War in 19th Century China (illustrated ed.). China Heritage Quarterly (27). China Heritage Project, ANU College of Asia & the Pacific (CAP), The Australian National University. Hang, Xing (2016). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. Stanford University Press. p. Hang, Xing (2016). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. 1620-1720. Cambridge University Press. 1620-1720. Cambridge University Press. Hang, Xing (2016). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. 1620-1720. Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, Philip A. (1990). Soulstealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768. Harvard University Press. 662; Dennerline (2002), p. Wakeman (1985), p. 647; Struve (1988), p. Lui, Adam Yuen-chung (1989). Two Rulers in One Reign: Dorgon and Shun-chih, 1644-1660. Faculty of Asian Studies monographs // The Australian National University (illustrated ed.). Faculty of Asian Studies, Australian National University. Cheng, Weikun (1998). “6 politics of the queue: agitation and resistance in the beginning and end of qing china”. In Hiltebeitel, Alf; Miller, Barbara D. (eds.). Hair: Its Power and Meaning in Asian Cultures (illustrated ed.). Conflict and Commerce in Maritime East Asia: The Zheng Family and the Shaping of the Modern World, c. Hang, Xing (2016). “2 From smuggler-pirates to loyal Confucians”. 1620-1720. Cambridge University Press. 2001). Alternate Identities: The Chinese of Contemporary Thailand. Godley, Michael R. (September 2011). “The End of the Queue: Hair as Symbol in Chinese History”. China Heritage Quarterly (27). China Heritage Project, The Australian National University. Justus Doolittle (1876). Social Life of the Chinese: With Some Account of Their Religious, Governmental, Educational, and Business Customs and Opinions. With Special But Not Exclusive Reference to Fuhchau. Edward J. M. Rhoads (2000). Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. University of Washington Press. Chee Kiong Tong; et al. 周锡保. 《中国古代服饰史》. 中国戏剧出版社. Twitchett, Denis; Fairbank, John K. (2008) Cambridge History of China Volume 9 Part 1 The Ch’ing Empire to 1800, pp. Lipman, Jonathan N. (1997). “4 / Strategies of Resistance Integration by Violence”. Familiar Strangers : A History of Muslims in Northwest China. University of Washington Press. Lipman, Jonathan N. (2011). Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. University of Washington Press. Lipman, Jonathan N. (1997). Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China. University of Washington Press. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. Pamela Kyle Crossley; Helen F. Siu; Donald S. Sutton (2006). Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China. University of California Press. Arienne M. Dwyer (2007). Salar. Chen, Yangbin (2008). Muslim Uyghur Students in a Chinese Boarding School: Social Recapitalization as a Response to Ethnic Integration. Emerging Perspectives on Education in China. Yakup, Abdurishid (2005). The Turfan Dialect of Uyghur. Vol. 63 of Turcologica Series (illustrated ed.). Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. Brophy, David (2016). Uyghur Nation: Reform and Revolution on the Russia-China Frontier. James Millward (1998). Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759-1864. Stanford University Press. State University of New York Press. Hiltebeitel, Alf, ed. (1998). Hair: Its Power and Meaning in Asian Cultures. 2003). Old Hong Kong – Volume One. Central, Hong Kong: Text Form Asia books Ltd. Modern Chinese Literature and Culture, Volume 19, Issue 1. Foreign Language Publications. Edward J. M. Rhoads (2000). Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. University of Washington Press. Anthony, Robert J. (2014). “Violence and Predation on the Sino-Vietnamese Maritime Frontier, 1450-1850”. Asia Major. George Cockburn (1896). John Chinaman: His Ways and Notions. J. Gardner Hitt. pp. The Museum Journal. The Museum. James, Henry Evan Murchison (1888). The Long White Mountain, or, A journey in Manchuria: with some account of the history, people, administration and religion of that country. Boulger, Demetrius C. (1899). “The Dissolution of the Chinese Empire”. The North American Review. Longmans, Green, and Co. pp. Boulger, Demetrius C. (1900). “America’s Share in a Partition of China”. The North American Review. Boulger, Demetrius Charles (28 April 1893). “Chapter IX”. Stanford University Press. p. Meyer-Fong, Tobie (2013). What Remains: Coming to Terms with Civil War in 19th Century China (illustrated ed.). Anderson, James A.; Whitmore, John K. (2014). China’s Encounters on the South and Southwest: Reforging the Fiery Frontier Over Two Millennia. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 3 Southeast Asia (reprint, revised ed.). Thái Mỹ (24 April 2019). “Con trai vua Lê Thế Tông ở đất Thanh Châu” (in Vietnamese). Lê Tiên Long (9 December 2018). “After Minh Mang reigned Nguyen Dynasty, why he deported Le royal descendants to the Southern Vietnam?” (in Vietnamese). Francis Michael Kelly, Randolph Schwabe (2002). European Costume and Fashion, 1490-1790. Dover Publications. Mark Ledbury, Robert Wellington (2020). The Versailles Effect: Objects, Lives, and Afterlives of the Domaine. Joan Nunn (2000). Fashion in Costume, 1200-2000. New Amsterdam Books. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. Lynn Festa (2005). “Personal Effects: Wigs and Possessive Individualism in the Long Eighteenth Century”. Military Innovation in Imperial Russia from Peter the Great to the Revolution. Bruce W. Menning, David Schimmelpenninck van der Oye (2004). Reforming the Tsar’s Army. Cambridge University Press. p. Philip Dwyer (2007). Napoleon, The Path to Power 1769 – 1799. Yale University Press. Terry Crowdy (2015). Napoleon’s Infantry Handbook An Essential Guide to Life in the Grand Army. Pen & Sword Military. Beverly Chico (2013). Hats and Headwear Around the World A Cultural Encyclopedia. R. F. Delderfield (2002). Napoleon’s Marshals. Janice Best (2023). Power and Propaganda in French Second Empire Theatre Playing Napoleon. Cooper Square Press. p. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. Stocqueler, Joachim Hayward (1871) A Familiar History of the British Army, from the Restoration in 1660 to the Present Time, Edward Stanford, London (pp. Borch, Fred L. (March 2012). “Lore of the Corps – The True Story of a Colonel’s Pigtail and a Court-Martial”. Dennerline, Jerry (2002). “The Shun-chih Reign”. Hudson, Elizabeth Harriot (1878), (The Life And Times of Louisa, Queen of Prussia With an Introductory Sketch of Prussian History: Volume II reprinted by Adamant Media Corporation (13 September 2001) (pp. In Peterson, Willard J. (ed.). Cambridge History of China, Vol. Ebrey, Patricia (1993). Chinese Civilization: A Sourcebook. 9, Part 1: The Ch’ing Dynasty to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Faure, David (2007). Emperor and Ancestor: State and Lineage in South China. Rhoads, Edward J. M. (2011). Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928. University of Washington Press. Sinor, Denis, ed. (1990). The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Volume 1 (illustrated, reprint ed.). Nguyễn Khắc Thuần (2005), Danh tướng Việt Nam, Nhà Xuất bản Giáo dục. In Frederic W. Mote; Denis Twitchett; John King Fairbank (eds.). Struve, Lynn (1988). “The Southern Ming”. Cambridge History of China, Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wakeman, Frederic (1985). The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-Century China. Wakeman, Frederic (1975b), “Localism and Loyalism During the Ch’ing Conquest of Kiangnan: The Tragedy of Chiang-yin”, in Frederic Wakeman Jr.; Carolyn Grant (eds.), Conflict and Control in Late Imperial China, Berkeley: Center of Chinese Studies, University of California, Berkeley, pp. University of California Press. Volume 1. University of California Press. 辽宁人民出版社. 张博泉 (Zhang Boquan) (1984). 《金史简编》. Wikimedia Commons has media related to Queues (hair fashion). This page was last edited on 12 December 2024, at 07:33 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.